by: Kajsa Sabatke, Interpretive Programs Coordinator
“This is beautiful - I love it!” “How ugly!” “I certainly wouldn’t choose this for my living room!"Regardless of your reaction to the wallpaper in the More House, one of the first words out of your mouth is likely to be, “Wow.” The brightly-colored, boldly-patterned paper is one feature that few people have a weak opinion about. I have gotten used to the paper after working in the house for over a year, but I still enjoy hearing the range of reactions from our visitors. My favorite comment to date is a ten-year-old boy who compared the More House to a funhouse.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e22/e9e227ed9ee3f89a44f4d305a9546c3c9bac8bd9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6501/a6501d99e44596a6bcce184ae92af1e9895c784a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a66/88a66ee5cf389677856245760a0dc8700dd63ac8" alt=""
1 comment:
The over-the-top vivid colors, (contrary to Chris Ohstrom's declarations) were NOT made in the manner now so vividly in place at the More Farm and (I understand at Don Carpentier's Eastfield Village. Preservation, it would appear, strange bedfellows make. It's pure fantasy on his part and ruins the restoration of what otherwise was a fairly interesting vernacular New York State farmnouse. That Mr. Ohrsrom was able to enlist so many to agree with his theory on Early American paint composition is a testament to the gullibility of the American public.
Post a Comment